The opinion in support of the decision being
entered today is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper 16
Filed by: Trial Section Merits Panel
Box Interference Filed: May 2, 2002
Washington, D.C. 20231
Tel: 703-308-9797
Fax: 703-305-0942
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
ANDINTERFERENCES
MAILED
IZUMU SAITO, YUMI KANEGAE
and MICHIO NAKAI MAY 2 - 2002
Junior Party,
Patent'5,700,470 PAT. & TM. OFFICE
BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
V.
AVENTIS PHARMA S.A.
Senior Party
Application 08/397,225
Patent Interference No. 104,819 (CAS)
Before: SCHAFER, TORCZON and SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judges.
SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judcie.
JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO 37 CFR § 1.662(a)
"Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 1.662(a), the party Saito hereby abandons the contest
as to Count 1 and claims 1-6 corresponding thereto" (Paper 15). Therefore, it is
ORDERED that judgment on priority as to Count 1 (Paper 1, p. 5),. the sole count
in the interference, is awarded against junior party IZUMU SAITO, YUMI KANEGAE
Page: 1 2 3 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007