The opinion in support of the decision being
entered today is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper 16
Filed by: Trial Section Merits Panel
Box Interference Filed: May 2,2002
Washington, D.C. 20231
Tel: 703-308-9797
Fax: 703-305-0942
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
ANDINTERFERENCES
MAILED
IZUMU SAITO, YUMI KANEGAE
and MICHIO NAKAI MAY 2 2002
Junior Party,
Patent 5,700,470 PAT. & T.M. OFFICE
BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
V.
JEAN-LUC IMLER, MAJID MEHTALI
and ANDREA PAVIRANI
Senior Party
Application 09/218,143
Patent Interference No. 104,820 (GAS)
Before: SCHAFER, TORCZON and SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judges.
SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judge.
JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO 37 CFR § 1.662(a)
"Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 1.662(a), the party Saito hereby abandons the contest
as to Count I and claims 1-6 corresponding thereto" (Paper 15). Therefore, it is
Page: 1 2 3 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007