The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 39
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JOSEF TRENDELKAMP and JURGEN VELTEL
____________
Appeal No. 1996-4167
Application No. 08/324,369
____________
ON BRIEF1
____________
Before STAAB, NASE, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 6, 9, 11
and 12, which are all of the claims pending in this application.2
We REVERSE.
1 On September 5, 2002, the appellants waived the oral hearing (see Paper No. 38) scheduled for
October 10, 2002.
2 Claims 11 and 12 were amended subsequent to the final rejection.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007