Ex Parte PARK - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1997-0198                                                        
          Application No. 08/227,609                                                  


               Claim 1 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it               
          reads as follows:                                                           
               1.   A method of presenting traffic event information at a             
               vehicle, the method comprising the steps:                              
                    transmitting a stream of traffic event information,               
               said traffic event information including a descriptive                 
               portion and a location portion;                                        
                    monitoring said stream of traffic event information at            
               said vehicle;                                                          
                    comparing at said vehicle said location portion of said           
               traffic event information relative to a previously stored              
               travel route model specifying a corresponding travel route             
               of said vehicle, said travel route model being defined at              
               said vehicle while said vehicle was previously traversing              
               said travel route; and                                                 
                    displaying for presentation at said vehicle a subset of           
               monitored traffic events, said subset including only events            
               which coincide geographically with said travel route.                  
               The references relied on by the examiner are:                          
          Sumner                   5,164,904                Nov. 17, 1992             
          Martell et al. (Martell)  5,317,311          May  31, 1994                  
                                             (filed Sep. 13, 1990)                    
               Claims 1, 2 and 4 through 14 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.            
          § 102(b) as being anticipated by Sumner.                                    
               Reference is made to the brief (paper number 14) and the               
          answer (paper number 15) for the respective positions of the                
          appellant and the examiner.                                                 



                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007