The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 37
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex Parte MICHAEL HENNIG-CARDINAL von WIDDERN
and
GUNTER WEBER
______________
Appeal No. 1998-0299
Application 08/301,523
_______________
HEARD: January 10, 2002
_______________
Before, JEFFREY T. SMITH, PAWLIKOWSKI and MOORE, Administrative
Patent Judges.
JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
Decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
Applicants appeal the decision of the Primary Examiner finally rejecting
claims 15 to 23, 25 to 29 and 31 to 34.1 We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.
§ 134.
1 Claims 24 and 30 were rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph; however, these
rejections have been withdrawn by the Examiner. (See Supplemental Examiner’s Answers paper
no. 29, mailed October 15, 1996 and paper no. 32, mailed October 30, 1997). Claims 24 and 30
have not been rejected over prior art.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007