THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today was not written for publication in a law
journal and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 32
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte MATTHEW B. STUDHOLME
_______________
Appeal No. 1998-0470
Application No. 08/522,123
_______________
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
_______________
Before STONER, Chief Administrative Patent Judge ; HARKCOM, Vice
Chief Administrative Patent Judge ; and EDWARD C. KIMLIN,
Administrative Patent Judge.
Per curiam.
On October 26, 1996, applicant filed a Notice of Appeal
(Paper No. 12). On December 14, 2001, applicant filed a
communication abandoning the present application in favor of a
Continued Prosecution Application (Paper No. 31).
Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that the appeal filed October 26, 1996 (Paper
No. 12) is dismissed.
Page: 1 2 3 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007