Ex Parte YAEGER - Page 1



          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was               
          not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the              
          Board.                                                                       

                                                             Paper No. 33              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                        
                                   _______________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                   _______________                                     
                               Ex parte JOHN R. YAEGER                                 
                                   _______________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 1998-0990                                  
                              Application No. 08/327,389                               
                                   _______________                                     
                                 HEARD: June 12, 2002                                  
                                   _______________                                     
          Before HAIRSTON, FLEMING and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges.            
          FLEMING, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        
                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
                    This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from            
          the final rejection of claims 1 through 22, all the claims                   
          pending in the instant application.                                          
                    The Appellant’s invention relates generally to a disc              
          drive system.  In particular, Appellant’s invention is directed              


                                           1                                           




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007