Appeal No. 1998-1671 6 Application No. 08/481,186 same purpose. Moreover, we recognized that the claim did not preclude the presence of a water containing composition. As such, we concluded that the basic thrust of the rejection by the examiner and the Board was the same and appellants have had fair opportunity to react to the water containing composition of Albanese. As to the balance of appellants’ arguments, each of them has previously been addressed in our Decision and we do not find in the Request any argument convincing us of error in the conclusions we reached in our Decision.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007