The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board Paper No. 20 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte GORDON SWEENIE and DON SPEARS __________ Appeal No. 1998-2436 Application 08/550,667 __________ ON BRIEF __________ Before KIMLIN, WALTZ and PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent Judges. PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-10, which are all the claims pending in this application. Claim 1 is illustrative of the invention: 1. A synthetic turf having a substrate and a plurality of synthetic polymer turf filaments anchored in the substrate and extending therefrom, said filaments having a denier ranging between 100 and 1200, and each said filament having a substantially diamond-shaped cross section with aPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007