Appeal No. 1998-2864 Application No. 08/338,235 display alarm conditions to an operator) and coupling the portable unit to the alarm providing means for responding to receipt of an alarm-condition signal in order to display the alarm condition (again, in Kobayashi, the display of the portable unit 25 will indicate an alarm condition since an abnormality of the vehicle system will be displayed to the operator and any abnormality is an alarm condition). CONCLUSION We have sustained the rejection of claims 1, 2, 4, 7, 8, 16, 17 and 19 under 35 U.S.C. 103 but we have not sustained the rejection of claims 6, 14 and 15 under 35 U.S.C. 103. Accordingly, the examiner’s decision is affirmed-in-part. -16–Page: Previous 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007