Ex parte LANA et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1998-3189                                                        
          Application No. 08/763,352                                                  





                    21.  A method of removing contaminating hydrogen                  
               sulfide from a flowing gas stream of natural gas or a                  
               flowing gas stream derived from petroleum or from natural              
               gas and producing a product stream consisting essentially              
               of the gas stream, elemental sulfur and water,                         
               comprising:                                                            
                    (1) contacting the contaminated gas stream with a                 
               liquid sulfuric acid aqueous medium having a selectable                
               sulfuric acid content of between 80% and 96% by weight;                
                    (2) reacting the hydrogen sulfide with the liquid                 
               sulfuric acid aqueous medium at a selectable temperature               
               between 120 C and 150 C; ando        o                                                  
                    (3) controlling both the sulfuric acid content of                 
               the aqueous medium and the reaction temperature such that              
               the hydrogen sulfide is reacted to essentially water and               
               elemental sulfur.                                                      
               The prior art references relied upon by the examiner are:              
          Maddox, Jr. et al. (Maddox)   3,849,540           Nov. 19, 1974             
          Torrence et al. (Torrence)    3,917,799           Nov.  4, 1975             
          Mellor, A Comprehensive Treatise on Inorganic and Theoretical               
          Chemistry, Vol. X, p. 142 (London, Longmans, Green and Co.,                 
          1947).                                                                      
               Claims 34, 35 and 36 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §                  
          112, first paragraph, as lacking descriptive support in the                 
          application disclosure as originally filed.  Claims 21 through              
          37 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over                

                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007