Ex parte JOHANSSON et al. - Page 7




          Appeal No. 1999-0084                                                        
          Application No. 08/448,854                                                  


               Mack for the handover method of Menich et al.  The                     
               Appellant [sic] respectfully submits that the                          
               teaching of Mack is completely unrelated to a                          
               handover process and can not be combined with the                      
               teaching of the Menich et al [reference], which                        
               relates to the handover process.  Therefore, there                     
               is no valid basis for combining the teaching of Mack                   
               with that of Menich et al. and such combination                        
               clearly amounts to improper use of hindsight.                          
               We agree with appellants’ argument that the skilled                    
          artisan would not have looked to the stationary remote station              
          teachings of Mack to modify the mobile station handover                     
          teachings of Menich.  Turning to Toriyama, we likewise agree                
          with the appellants’ argument (brief, page 8) that                          
          “[e]xpanding the coverage area of a cordless phone has no                   
          relevance to enlarging the overlapping regions of a cellular                
          system for a handover process.”                                             














                                          7                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007