Appeal No. 1999-0140
Application No. 08/622,953
reply brief. Moreover, for the reasons explained by the1
appellants (e.g., see pages 2-4 of the reply brief), Hasman’s
product cannot be regarded as having a solid fat index profile
of the type defined by the appealed product claims. In
response to the appellants’ arguments concerning the above-
discussed claim distinctions, the examiner expresses her
1Significantly, the examiner has not disagreed with the
appellants on this matter.
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007