The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 24 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte HISANORI NASU, YOSHITAKA NAKAMURA, HITOSHI FUJIMIYA and KENJI YAMAMOTO __________ Appeal No. 1999-0329 Application No. 08/212,818 __________ ON BRIEF __________ Before WINTERS, ADAMS, and GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judges. ADAMS, Administrative Patent Judge. VACATUR and REMAND TO THE EXAMINER On consideration of the record we find this case is not in condition for a decision on appeal. For the reasons that follow, we vacate1 the pending rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 103 and remand the application to the examiner to consider the following issues and to take appropriate action. 1 Lest there be any misunderstanding, the term “vacate” in this context means to set aside or to void. When the Board vacates an examiner’s rejection, the rejection is set aside and no longer exists.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007