Ex parte ODAKA et al. - Page 2




              Appeal No. 1999-0392                                                               Page 2                 
              Application No. 08/548,759                                                                                


                                                   BACKGROUND                                                           

                     Appellants’ invention relates to a color cathode-ray tube having non-glare means on                
              the internal surface of the faceplate.  An understanding of the invention can be derived from             
              a reading of exemplary claim 1, which is reproduced below.                                                
                     1.     A color cathode-ray tube having a black matrix and a phosphor layer                         
              disposed with respect to an internal surface of a faceplate, wherein a light scattering film              
              having light scattering characteristics providing a nonglare effect is formed by fixing a                 
              metal containing compound having a high index of refraction and a particle size of 0.1 µm                 
              to 2 µm on said internal surface of said faceplate for providing scattering reflection of                 
              external light, and said black matrix and said phosphor layer are formed on said light                    
              scattering film.                                                                                          

                                                                    1                                                   
                     The prior art references of record relied upon  by the examiner in rejecting the                   
              appealed claims are:                                                                                      
              Nishimura et al. (Nishimura)              5,141,461                   Aug. 25, 1992                       
              Kawamura et al. (Kawamura)         JP 03 250540                Nov. 08, 1991                              

                     Claims 1-3, 8, 9 and 16-18 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                           
              unpatentable over Nishimura in view of Kawamura.                                                          



                     The examiner lists the following references at page 3 of the answer, but does not  list them in the1                                                                                                 
              statement of the rejection nor does the examiner discuss the relevance of them in the answer.             
              Wengert et al. (Wengert)           4,622,272                   Nov. 11, 1986                              
              Gibilini et al. (Gibilini)         5,101,136                   Mar. 31, 1992                              
              Iwasaki                            5,177,400                   Jan.  05, 1993                             
              Therefore, we have not considered them in our decision.                                                   







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007