Ex Parte TUASON et al - Page 2




              Appeal No. 1999-0675                                                                     Page 2                
              Application No. 08/379,803                                                                                     


                                                    THE INVENTION                                                            
                      According to Appellants, the invention relates to a non-nutritive, fat-like agent for use in           
              the preparation of low-calorie food compositions (specification at 1, ll. 4-5).  Claim 1 is                    
              illustrative:                                                                                                  
                      1. A composition comprising dry, water-dispersible particles, said particles consisting                
              essentially of an agglomerate of components comprising microreticulated or microfibrillated                    
              microcrystalline cellulose in a predominant amount by weight, and a hydrocolloid selected from                 
              a [sic] the group consisting of carboxymethylcellulose and xanthan gum in an amount sufficient                 
              to provide effective coverage of the cellulose, which agglomerate readily disperses in water into              
              its component parts under aqueous food-processing conditions.                                                  
                                                     THE EVIDENCE                                                            
                      As evidence of unpatentability, the Examiner relies upon the following prior art                       
              references:                                                                                                    
              McGinley et al. (McGinley)           5,192,569                    Mar. 9, 1993                                 
                                                                         (filed Dec. 18, 1991)                               
              Concise Encyclopedia Chemistry 437 (Mary Eagleson trans., 1994)(Encyclopedia)                                  


                                                    THE REJECTIONS                                                           
                      Claims 1-13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being anticipated by McGinley                   
              and under the judicially-created doctrine of obviousness-type double patenting as unpatentable                 
              over claims 15 and 21 of McGinley in view of the Encyclopedia (Answer at 3-5).  We reverse for                 
              the following reasons.                                                                                         









Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007