Ex parte THACKERAY et al. - Page 4



          Appeal No. 1999-0771                                                        
          Application No. 08/640,144                                                  

               The examiner maintains that polyanthryl acrylate is formed             
          when compound (A) is polymerized and on that basis concludes that           
          the polymer or resin binder formed in the process disclosed in              
          Green (‘052) is identical to the claimed resin binder.  See Answer,         
          p. 7.                                                                       
               Appellants argue that the claimed resin binder is a copolymer          
          composed of 9-anthrylmethyl acrylate units as well as carboxy               
          and/or alkyl ester units.  See Brief, p. 7.  However, the examiner          
          argues that appellants' claims are not limited to copolymers.  The          
          examiner explains that when x equals 1 in claim 38 a homopolymer            
          results, namely, the polyanthryl acrylate taught in Green (‘052).           
          See Answer, p. 8.                                                           
               Claim 38 recites a value of x “between 0.1 and 1.0.”  By               
          definition, the term “between” excludes the end points of the               
          claimed range, i.e., 0.1 and 1.0.  Therefore, claim 38 does not             
          include resin binders composed solely of anthracene units (x = 1)           
          as maintained by the examiner.  Rather, claim 38 requires a resin           
          binder composed of anthracene units as well as carboxy and/or alkyl         





                                          4                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007