Ex Parte LANDOM et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 1999-0828                                       Page 2           
          Application No. 08/526,743                                                  

          Representative claim 1 is set forth as follows:                             
               1. A method for operating a system to automatically provide            
          price quotes for a plurality of different types of barcode                  
          printing supply products associated with different types of                 
          barcode printers, said system having a display for displaying               
          information and an input device operable by a user to selectively           
          change said displayed information, said method comprising:                  
               displaying a default quote depicting a default value for               
          each of a plurality of variables defining a barcode printing                
          supply product;                                                             
               storing for at least one of said barcode printing supply               
          product defining variables a set of allowable options for other             
          of said barcode printing supply product defining variables                  
          associated with said one variable;                                          
               changing said displayed default quote in response to a user            
          input change of the default value of said one variable to                   
          automatically depict any necessary changes in said other                    
          variables associated with said one variable based upon said                 
          stored set of allowable options.                                            
               The prior art reference of record relied upon by the                   
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims is:                               
          Greulich et al. (Greulich)    5,241,464      August 31, 1993                
               Claims 1-4, 9, 11, 17, and 18 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.           
          § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Greulich in view of Official            
          notice taken by the examiner.                                               
               Rather than reiterate the conflicting viewpoints advanced by           
          the examiner and appellants regarding the above-noted rejection,            
          we make reference to the answer (Paper No. 11, mailed October 28,           






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007