Ex parte SAYA - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1999-0861                                                        
          Application No. 08/916,413                                                  


               Claim 1 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it               
          reads as follows:                                                           
                    1.  A vibration motor which is drivable at different              
               frequencies and has a desired target speed, each                       
               frequency causing the vibration motor to be driven at a                
               respective, corresponding speed and a respective,                      
               corresponding torque, the vibration motor entering a                   
               specific mode after being started and driven, the                      
               vibration motor comprising:                                            
                    a detection unit which detects when the                           
               vibration motor enters the specific mode; and                          
                    a drive control unit which, when the vibration                    
               motor is started, drives the vibration motor at the                    
               frequency that causes the vibration motor to be driven at              
               approximately the maximum starting torque and, when the                
               detection unit detects that the vibration motor enters                 
               the specific mode, drives the vibration motor at a                     
               frequency that causes the vibration motor to be driven at              
               approximately the target speed.                                        
               The reference relied on by the examiner is:                            
          Suganuma                 5,477,099                Dec. 19,                  
          1995                                                                        
                                   (effective filing date Feb. 11,                    
          1991)                                                                       
               Claims 1, 2, 4 through 8 and 10 through 21 stand rejected              
          under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being anticipated by Suganuma.                  
               Claims 3 and 9 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                 
          being unpatentable over Suganuma.                                           
               Reference is made to the briefs (paper numbers 28 and                  

                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007