Ex Parte WEINBERG et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1999-0928                                                        
          Application No. 08/334,952                                                  


          invention.  See 37 CFR § 1.142(b).  We have jurisdiction pursuant           
          to 35 U.S.C. § 134.                                                         
               According to appellants, the invention is directed to a                
          method for the electrolysis of water for enhanced production of             
          oxygen, hydrogen and heat by the application of a unique                    
          repeating sequence of voltages (Brief, pages 2 and 4).                      
          Illustrative independent claim 1 is reproduced below:                       
               1.    A method for electrolyzing water to produce                      
               oxygen, hydrogen and heat which comprises the steps of:                
                    (i) providing an electrochemical cell comprising                  
               an isotopic hydrogen storage cathode, an electrically                  
               conductive anode and an ionically conducting electro-                  
               lyte comprising water, and                                             
                    (ii) impressing a repeating sequence of voltages                  
               across said cathode and anode comprised of at least two                
               cell voltage regimes, a first cell voltage regime                      
               consisting of a voltage sufficient to enhance cathodic                 
               absorption of hydrogen, and a second cell voltage                      
               regime consisting of at least one voltage pulse which                  
               is at least 2 times the voltage of the first cell                      
               voltage regime for a total duration no greater than                    
               0.10 seconds.                                                          
               A list of the prior art relied upon by the examiner as                 
          evidence of unpatentability may be found on pages 4-5 of the                














Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007