Appeal No. 1999-0989 3
Application No. 08/265,267
THE REJECTIONS
Claims 1 and 29 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being clearly
anticipated by Gabrick.
Claims 1, 24, 27, and 29 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over Gabrick.
Claims 2, 5, 9, 12, and 21 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over Gabrick in view of Winkler.
Claims 3 and 4 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable
over Gabrick and Winkler in view of Sugimori.
Claim 6 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over
Nakano in view of Gabrick.
Claims 7, 8, and 11 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over Biron in view of Gabrick.
Claim 10 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over
Thirumalachar in view of Gabrick and Biron.
Claim 22 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over
Nakano in view of Gabrick, Winkler and Sugimori.
Claims 23 and 26 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007