The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today was not written for publication and
is not binding precedent of the Board
Paper No. 25
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte N. THORTON LIPSCOMB
And OMAR M. BUAZZA
___________
Appeal No. 1999-1071
Application No. 08/453,770
___________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before GARRIS, WALTZ and PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent
Judges.
PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the final rejection of
claims 41-47, 49-58, 60-76, 81-85, 87-94, 97, 98, 100-103, 105,
106, 108-110, 112-120, 122-129, 131-140, 142-158, 163-167, 169-
176, 179, 180, 182-185, 187, 188, 190-192, 194-202, and 204-229.
With respect to the status of the other claims of the present
application, we refer to pages 2 and 3 of appellants’ brief, and
note that these other claims are not under consideration in the
appeal.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007