Ex parte LI et al. - Page 2




                     Appeal No. 1999-1190                                                                                                                                              
                     Application 08/481,367                                                                                                                                            


                                                                             THE INVENTION                                                                                             
                                The appellants’ claimed invention is directed toward a                                                                                                 
                     method for removing embedded contamination from a metallic                                                                                                        
                     surface by directing a laser beam onto the surface such that                                                                                                      
                     laser-generated melt pool liquid is directly ejected from the                                                                                                     
                     surface.  Claim 12 is illustrative:                                                                                                                               
                                12. A method for the removal of embedded contamination                                                                                                 
                     from a metallic surface, the method comprising directing a                                                                                                        
                     laser beam on to [sic, onto] the surface, the laser beam                                                                                                          
                     having sufficient power density to melt at least a portion of                                                                                                     
                     said surface and to cause direct ejection of laser-generated                                                                                                      
                     melt pool liquid from the metallic surface by laser-generated                                                                                                     
                     vapor pressure in the melt pool liquid, thereby removing a                                                                                                        
                     portion of said metallic surface layer containing the embedded                                                                                                    
                     contamination.                                                                                                                                                    
                                                                            THE REFERENCES                                                                                             
                     Wu et al. (Wu)                      4,898,650       Feb.  6,                                                                                                      
                     1990                                                                                                                                                              
                     Boquillon et al. (Boquillon)        5,151,134       Sep. 29,                                                                                                      
                     1992                                                                                                                                                              
                     Wojcik et al. (EPA ‘646)            0 091 646       Oct. 19,                                                                                                      
                     1983                                                                                                                                                              
                                (European patent application)                                                                                                                          
                     Hiromi (JP ‘200)                     4-109200       Apr. 10,1                                                                                                                               
                     1992                                                                                                                                                              
                                (Japanese patent application)                                                                                                                          
                                                                            THE REJECTIONS                                                                                             

                                1Our consideration of JP ‘200 is based upon the English                                                                                                
                     translation thereof which is of record.                                                                                                                           
                                                                                          2                                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007