The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 19 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte WILLI B. HENSEL ____________ Appeal No. 1999-1487 Application No. 08/591,599 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before COHEN, STAAB, and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judges. COHEN, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 through 6 and 9 through 11. Claims 7 and 8 are objected to but otherwise are allowable. These claims constitute all of the claims in the application. Appellant’s invention pertains to a working chair. A basic understanding of the invention can be derived from aPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007