The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte STEVEN K. SKOOG,
and GREGORY A TABOR
____________
Appeal No. 1999-1558
Application No. 08/551,303
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before HAIRSTON, FLEMING, and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent
Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1, 3
through 9, 11 through 22 and 24. Claims 2, 10, 23 and 25 would
be allowable if rewritten to include all of the limitations of
the base claim and any intervening claims.
The disclosed invention relates to a method and apparatus
for transmitting code word from a stylus to a host computer in a
continuous stream of packets. At the host computer, the
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007