Ex Parte DAVIS et al - Page 12



          Appeal No. 1999-1697                                                        
          Application No. 08/550,270                                Page 12           

          taking of Official notice by the examiner that this feature is              
          old and well known.  In view of: the combined teachings of: (a)             
          the Official notice taken by the examiner (answer, pages 4 and 5)           
          that “with modems as well as PCMCIA adapter interfaces it is well           
          known to mount boards within casings (for component protection,             
          for example), and that a connection must be made from the board             
          to the exterior.  In a typical PCMCIA interface, as well as other           
          types of plug-in interfaces, this connection is made with a board           
          mounted connector, through an aperture.” which has not been                 
          specifically traversed by appellants2; (b)Hartley's disclosure              
          that modem 3 (figure 3) can be either a plug-in card or                     
          integrated into the main PC board; and (c)Blackwell's disclosure            
          that analog and digital devices (col. 2, lines 55 and 56) are               
          built on cards, we find that the prior art would have suggested             
          that the communications device could be attached to the computer            
          in a number of equivalent ways, and that an artisan would have              
          been motivated to install the data communications device of                 
          Blackwell as a plug-in carrier board accessible from outside                

               2  We observe that the examiner has cited U.S. Patent 5,430,618 to     
          Huang to support the examiner's position of Official notice.  Because       
          appellants have not specifically traversed the examiner's holding, and the  
          examiner has not positively included Huang in the statement of the rejection,
          we need not address the teachings of Huang, which was not formally included in
          the statement of the rejection.                                             





Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007