Ex Parte IKEZAWA et al - Page 6


             Appeal No. 1999-1808                                                                                     
             Application 08/826,305                                                                                   
                    The Appellants have also asserted that there is no reasonable expectation of                      
             success that an aqueous coating including molybdenum disulfide, a hydrophilic resin,                     
             water and antimony sulfide will successfully produce a coating agent that forms a                        
             lubricating film having enhanced lubrication properties.  (Appeal Brief, page 7, lines 20-               
             24).  The only support for this statement is found in the Appeal Brief, page 9, lines 6-22,              
             wherein the Appellants state:                                                                            
                    Clearly, the influence of a hydrophilic resin on the lubricating properties of MoS2               
                    and SbS3 is entirely unpredictable.  The mere fact that Sb2S3 interacts with MoS2                 
                    in a powdered form to produce a lubricant having enhanced lubricating properties                  
                    does not give rise to a reasonable expectation that Sb2S3 will interact similarly                 
                    with MoS2 in an aqueous coating agent further comprising a substantial amount                     
                    of a hydrophilic resin.  In fact, Nosov anticipated the unpredictable effects of                  
                    binders (i.e. a resin) on the properties of solid lubricants and, accordingly, limited            
                    his study to lubricant coatings in the form of finely dispersed powders.                          
                    Specifically, Nosov states:                                                                       
                           Although such coatings are less durable, they are extremely useful for                     
                           studying the properties of solid lubricants because they allow the                         
                           elimination of certain side effects caused by binders, fillers, and several                
                           other technological factors. (Appeal Brief, page 9, lines 6-22).                           
                    We note that nowhere does Nosov actually state that the effects of binders are                    
             unpredictable.  Rather, what Nosov is stating is that he is isolating the active elements                
             in the composition to provide a true comparison illustrating the benefits of antimony                    
             sulfide.  We conclude that Nosov intended his results to transcend any one particular                    
             binder system, and was not implying that binders were so unpredictable that he had to                    
             remove them from the system.  He was simply reducing clutter and excess variables to                     
             illustrate the benefits of the antimony sulfides in a solid lubricant system.                            
                    We therefore conclude that one of ordinary skill in the art would have had a                      
             reasonable expectation of success in including the Nosov molybdenum disulfide -                          
             antimony sulfide system in an aqueous coating system such as Laepple.                                    


                                                          6                                                           



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007