Ex parte TANIGAWA et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1999-1878                                       Page 2           
          Application No. 08/799,411                                                  


                                     BACKGROUND                                       
               Appellants’ invention relates to a polyacetal resin                    
          composition and a method of making such a composition.  An                  
          understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading                
          of exemplary claim 1, which is reproduced below.                            
                         1.  A polyacetal resin composition which                     
                    comprises about 100 parts by weight of a polyacetal               
                    having a residual fluorine concentration of not more              
                    than about 13 ppm and a concentration of                          
                    formaldehyde generated when the polyacetal is heated              
                    at about 230 EC for about 30 minutes in nitrogen of               
                    not more than about 500 ppm; from about 0.01 to                   
                    about 3 parts by weight of an antioxidant; and from               
                    about 0.001 to about 5 parts by weight of a basic                 
                    substance, wherein the polyacetal is a polymer                    
                    obtained by polymerizing trioxane or a mixture of                 
                    trioxane with a comonomer in the presence of at                   
                    least one polymerization catalyst selected from the               
                    group consisting of boron trifluoride, boron                      
                    trifluoride hydrate and a coordination complex                    
                    compound of an organic compound containing an oxygen              
                    atom and a sulfur atom with boron trifluoride.                    
               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          MacDonald                               2,768,994           Oct.            
          30, 1956                                                                    
          Walling et al. (Walling)                3,027,352           Mar.            
          27, 1962                                                                    

          filed” (brief, page 2) is obviously in error since appellants’              
          do not refer to that subsequently filed amendment after final               
          (Paper No. 11) in their brief.                                              







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007