Ex Parte GOERTZ et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1999-1926                                                        
          Application No. 08/675,938                                                  


          at least one supporting element for the dielectric insert for               
          fixing it in a direction deviating from the fixing direction of             
          the dielectric insert by the clamping body.  See Figure 1 of the            
          disclosure.  A further understanding of the invention can be                
          achieved by the following claim.                                            
               1.  A waveguide-resonator device, comprising a waveguide; a            
          dielectric insert arranged inside said waveguide and formed as a            
          disc-shaped cylinder; a plurality of clamping bodies for fixing             
          said dielectric insert inside said waveguide in a fixing                    
          direction, said clamping bodies being arranged between said                 
          waveguide and an outer periphery of said dielectric insert and              
          contacting said dielectric insert only tangentially; and a                  
          supporting element for fixing said dielectric insert in a                   
          direction which deviates from said fixing direction of said                 
          dielectric insert by said clamping bodies, at least one of said             
          clamping bodies being mounted on said waveguide so that a                   
          changeable clamping pressure relative to said dielectric insert             
          is adjustable, said clamping bodies being formed as bars which              
          project toward an outer circumference of said cylinder and contact          
          said insert only tangentially.                                              
               The Examiner relies on the following references:                       
          Mizumura et al. (Mizumura)    4,609,883           Sep.  2, 1986             
          Hendrick et al. (Hendrick)    5,034,711           July 23, 1991             
          Shen                          5,324,713           June 28, 1994             
          Dorothy et al. (Dorothy)      5,457,087           Oct. 10, 1995             
                                                  (filed Dec. 3, 1993)                
               Claims 9-11, 23, 26, 30, 31, 34, 37 and 38 stand rejected              
          under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as being anticipated by Shen.                         
               Claims 1, 4, 7, 8, 20, 21, 24, 33, 35 and 36 stand rejected            
          under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Shen in view of            
          Hendrick.                                                                   

                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007