Appeal No. 1999-2001
Application No. 08/664,089
a graphics controller coupled to said processor for
outputting video information defined using a first signal type;
a translation board removably coupled to said graphics
controller for receiving said video information defined using
said first signal type and outputting video information defined
using a second signal type; and
a display coupled to said translation board for receiving
said video information defined using said second signal type.
The prior art references of record relied upon by the
examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:
Shah 5,406,199 Apr. 11, 1995
Koenig 5,559,448 Sep. 24, 1996
(filed Apr. 07, 1995)
Sakoda et al. (Sakoda) 5,559,954 Sep. 24, 1996
(filed Mar. 29, 1995)
Reinhardt 5,598,565 Jan. 28, 1997
(filed Dec. 29, 1993)
Claims 1, 2, 4 through 10, and 23 stand rejected under
35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Sakoda in view of
Shah.
Claims 3, 11, and 14 through 16 stand rejected under
35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Sakoda in view of Shah
and Koenig.
Claims 12, 13, and 17 through 22 stand rejected under
35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Sakoda in view of
Shah, Koenig, and Reinhardt.
Reference is made to the Examiner's Answer (Paper No. 15,
mailed December 17, 1998) for the examiner's complete reasoning
in support of the rejections, and to appellants' Brief (Paper
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007