The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 28
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ANDREW HACKETT, MICHAEL KNEE, MICHEL KERDRANVAT,
and NADINE BOLENDER
____________
Appeal No. 1999-2012
Application No. 08/801,610
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before HAIRSTON, BARRETT, and LALL, Administrative Patent
Judges.
LALL, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from
the Examiner's final rejection of claims 2, 5, 6, 9, 11 and1
13.
The disclosed invention is directed to a method and
apparatus for determining motion vectors for respective pixels
1Appellants have withdrawn claims 3, 7 and 8 from appeal,
see brief at page 2.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007