The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 21 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte SUSHUMNA IRUVANTI, KEITH S. OLSEN, and KRISHNA G. SACHDEV _____________ Appeal No. 1999-2153 Application No. 08/958,848 ______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before GARRIS, LIEBERMAN, and DELMENDO, Administrative Patent Judges. GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1, 3-16, 18, 19, 21 and 22 which are all of the claims remaining in the application. The subject matter on appeal relates to a thermally conductive paste having enhanced thermal conductivity and paste properties comprising a non-aqueous dielectric liquid carrier, aPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007