Ex Parte IRUVANTI et al - Page 1



               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not     
               written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.     
                                                            Paper No. 21              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    _____________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    _____________                                     
                            Ex parte SUSHUMNA IRUVANTI,                               
                                   KEITH S. OLSEN,                                    
                                        and                                           
                                 KRISHNA G. SACHDEV                                   
                                    _____________                                     
                                Appeal No. 1999-2153                                  
                             Application No. 08/958,848                               
                                   ______________                                     
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                   _______________                                    
          Before GARRIS, LIEBERMAN, and DELMENDO, Administrative Patent               
          Judges.                                                                     
          GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        
                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on an appeal from the final rejection of            
          claims 1, 3-16, 18, 19, 21 and 22 which are all of the claims               
          remaining in the application.                                               
               The subject matter on appeal relates to a thermally                    
          conductive paste having enhanced thermal conductivity and paste             
          properties comprising a non-aqueous dielectric liquid carrier, a            





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007