Ex Parte LINSLEY et al - Page 4




              Appeal No. 1999-2330                                                                                      
              Application No. 08/219,200                                                                                

              T cell proliferation in GVH disease.  Specification page 26.  In addition, B7Ig may be                    
              used to crosslink the CD28 receptor, for example by contacting T cells with immobilized                   
              B7Ig fusion protein, to assist in recovery of immune function after bone marrow                           
              transplantation by stimulating T cell proliferation.  Specification page 27.                              
                     The fusion proteins may be useful to regulate granulocyte macrophage colony                        
              stimulating factor levels for the treatment of cancers, AIDS, and myelodysplasia.   Id.                   
              Moreover, the inhibition of anti-CD28 and anti B7mAbs on the cognate Th:B interaction                     
              also provides the basis for employing the CD28Ig and B7Ig fusion proteins to treat                        
              various autoimmune disorders associated with exaggerated B cell activation such as                        
              insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, myasthenia gravis, rheumatoid arthritis and                          
              systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).  Specification, page 72.  Methods for preparing                       
              B7Ig fusions proteins are described in the specification at pages 52-55.                                  


              Grounds of Rejection                                                                                      
                     Claims 79-94 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, for lack of                    
              enablement.                                                                                               
                     Claims 79-94 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph and second                      
              paragraph for failing to define the invention in a manner as to enable any person skilled                 
              in the art to make and use the invention and for failing to point out and distinctly claim                
              the invention.                                                                                            
                     We reverse both rejections for the reasons herein.                                                 
                                                           4                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007