Appeal No. 1999-2383 Application No. 08/573,487 pigment of Hosomura overlaps the claimed pigment particle size at one endpoint, i.e., 1.5 microns (Answer, page 3). As discussed above, Hosomura teaches away from the claimed AP values. The examiner has not shown by convincing evidence or reasoning, from this one finding that the pigment particle sizes overlap, that the properties of coefficient of friction and smoothness of the Hosomura paper would necessarily be the same as the claimed values. For the foregoing reasons, based on the totality of the record, we determine that the preponderance of evidence weighs most heavily in favor of patentability in view of the reference evidence. Accordingly, the examiner’s rejection of claims 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 16, 18 and 20 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) over Hosomura is reversed.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007