Ex Parte REZNAK - Page 2




              Appeal No. 1999-2416                                                                                       
              Application No. 08/705,449                                                                                 

                                                    BACKGROUND                                                           
                     The invention is directed to a multitasking data processing system and a method                     
              of controlling allocation of shared resources within the system.  Representative claim 1                   
              is reproduced below.                                                                                       
                     1.     A method of controlling allocation of shared resources within a                              
                     multitasking data processing system having a plurality of tasks, said method                        
                     comprising:                                                                                         
                            in response to a resource request for a portion of a shared resource by a                    
                     particular task among said plurality of tasks, determining whether or not granting                  
                     said resource request would cause a selected level of resource allocation to be                     
                     exceeded and determining whether or not granting said resource request would                        
                     cause a resource allocation limit to be exceeded;                                                   
                            in response to a determination that granting said resource request would                     
                     cause said resource allocation limit to be exceeded, denying said resource                          
                     allocation request;                                                                                 
                            in response to a determination that granting said resource request would                     
                     not cause said selected level of resource allocation to be exceeded, granting                       
                     said resource request; and                                                                          
                            in response to a determination that granting said resource request would                     
                     cause said selected level of resource allocation but not said resource allocation                   
                     limit to be exceeded, suspending execution of said particular task for a selected                   
                     penalty time and then granting said request.                                                        
                     The examiner relies on the following references:                                                    
              Ferguson et al. (Ferguson)                        5,210,872            May 11, 1993                        
              Camillone et al. (Camillone)                      5,421,011            May 30, 1995                        
                     Claims 1-3, 5, 6, 8-10, 12, 13, 15-18, 20, 21, and 23 stand rejected under 35                       
              U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Camillone and Ferguson.                                            


                                                           -2-                                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007