The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 27
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte SEUNG-HUN OH,
KI-UN NAMKOONG,
and
JIN-HAN KIM
____________
Appeal No. 1999-2435
Application No. 08/872,876
____________
HEARD: JULY 11, 2002
____________
Before OWENS, LIEBERMAN, and PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent Judges.
LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the decision of the examiner
refusing to allow claims 1, 2, 11 and 16. Claims 17 through 24 are allowed. Claims
4 through 10 and 12 through 15 are objected to as depending from a rejected claim.
Claim 3 is cancelled.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007