Ex Parte MUSAKA - Page 1




              The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written           
                      for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                   

                                                                           Paper No. 13            

                          UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                
                                           ____________                                            
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                   
                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                          
                                           ____________                                            
                                    Ex parte KATSUYUKI MUSAKA                                      
                                           ____________                                            
                                       Appeal No. 1999-2512                                        
                                   Application No. 08/888,499                                      
                                           ____________                                            
                                              ON BRIEF                                             
                                           ____________                                            
           Before WARREN, WALTZ, and POTEATE, Administrative Patent Judges.                        
           WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                     



                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                         
                 This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner's final                         
           rejection of claims 29 through 40 and 42 through 45, which are the                      
           only claims remaining in this application. We have jurisdiction                         
           pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.                                                            
                 According to appellants, the invention is directed to a plasma                    
           enhanced chemical vapor deposition process for depositing a                             
           halogen-containing silicon dioxide onto a substrate from a mixture                      
           of tetraethoxysilane (TEOS) and a halogen-containing gas, where the                     
           plasma is formed by simultaneously turning on a plurality of power                      






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007