Appeal No. 1999-2601 Application 08/862,682 reliance on Bates to overcome this particular deficiency is not well taken. Bates pertains to a study which monitored the force or tension required to pull a composite strand from the impregnation chamber and sizing die of a cross-head/thermoplastic pultrusion compounding system. According to the study, pulling tension may play a significant role in controlling fiber damage and resin impregnation, and may be indicative of what is occurring inside the impregnation chamber (see page 2047). The graphs illustrated in Figures 3 through 6 (see pages 2050 and 2051) depict experimental results showing the effects of various spreader pin quantities, spreader pin diameters and melt temperatures (i.e., viscosities) on the relationship between pulling force (tension) and speed. Of note is that the various experiments involve a common, constant entrance tension (see page 2048). In the examiner’s view (see pages 8, 9, 14, 15, 26 and 27 in the answer), Bates demonstrates that entrance tension as recited in claims 5 and 7 is an art-recognized, result-effective variable. From this, the examiner concludes that the specific entrance tension parameters set forth in these claims would have been obvious optimizations of this variable. Bates, however, demonstrates nothing of the sort. To the contrary, Bates’ 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007