Appeal No. 1999-2690
Application 08/720,563
reiterates the argument directed to Wilder’s lack of disclosure
of simultaneous sensor cell read out, an argument which we found
unpersuasive for all of the reasons discussed supra.
In summary, we have sustained the Examiner’s 35 U.S.C.
§ 102( b) rejection of all of the claims on appeal. Therefore,
the decision of the Examiner rejecting claims 1-9 is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED
JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
PARSHOTAM S. LALL )
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
)
) INTERFERENCES
)
HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP )
Administrative Patent Judge )
JFR:pgg
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007