The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was
not written for publication and is not binding precedent of
the Board.
Paper No. 49
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte DAVID T. BERQUIST, PETER M. EISENBERG,
MITCHELL B. GRUNES, MARTIN A. KENNER,
JOHN M. KRUSE, TIMOTHY A. MERTENS and
CINDY L. MUNSON
__________
Appeal No. 1999-2723
Application 08/674,082
___________
HEARD: January 9, 2002
___________
Before JERRY SMITH, BARRETT and FLEMING, Administrative Patent
Judges.
JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
from the examiner’s rejection of claims 1-50, 101, 107-123,
140 and 145-215. Pending claims 51-76, 98-100 and 102-106
stand withdrawn from consideration as being directed to a non-
elected invention. Claim 130 has been indicated to contain
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007