Ex Parte HUSSAIN et al - Page 1



                     The opinion in support of the decision being entered           
                          today was not written for publication and                 
                            is not binding precedent of the Board                   
                                                      Paper No. 32                  
                     UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                     __________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                         
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                     __________                                     
                               Ex parte HAMID HUSSAIN,                              
                               ROBERT R. MCDANIEL and                               
                                 MICHAEL J. CALLANAN                                
                                     ___________                                    
                                Appeal No. 1999-2815                                
                             Application No. 08/641,827                             
                                     ___________                                    
                             HEARD: JULY 11, 2002                                   
                                     __________                                     
         Before OWENS, LIEBERMAN and PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent             
         Judges.                                                                    
         PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent Judge.                                  
                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                 
                   This is a decision on an appeal from the final                   
         rejection of claims 1-19 and 39-46.  Claims 20-32 have been                
         withdrawn in view of a restriction requirement.                            
              The subject matter on appeal is represented by claim 1 which          
         is reproduced below:                                                       
              1.  A proppant particle comprising:                                   
              a particulate substrate; and                                          
              a coating comprising resin and fibrous material, wherein the          
         fibrous material is embedded in the coating to be dispersed                
         throughout the coating.                                                    





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007