Ex Parte WANG et al - Page 8

          Appeal No. 1999-2817                                                        
          Application 08/819,587                                                      

               To recap, we have reversed the rejection of claims 8, 12,              
          20 and 24 under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as being anticipated by Lee.  On            
          the other hand, we have sustained the rejection of claims 1-3, 6,           
          13-15 and 18 under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as being anticipated by                  
          Uramoto.  Accordingly, the decision of the examiner is affirmed-            
          in-part.                                                                    
               No time period for taking any subsequent action in                     
          connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR                    
          § 1.136(a).                                                                 
                                  AFFIRMED-IN-PART                                    





          James D. Thomas                 )                                           
               Administrative Patent Judge     )                                      
                    )                                                                 
                                                  )                                   
                                                  )                                   
                         Howard B. Blankenship           ) BOARD OF PATENT            
                         Administrative Patent Judge     )   APPEALS AND              
                                                  )  INTERFERENCES                    










Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November  3, 2007