Ex Parte WONG - Page 2



          Appeal No. 1999-2825                                                        
          Application 08/967,251                                                      

          Representative claim 1 is reproduced as follows:                            
               1.  A heuristic based motion estimation method for video               
          compression, said method comprising the steps of:                           
               defining a target block in a video clip;                               
               defining a simplified signature block from said target                 
          block, said simplified signature block being based on a row and             
          column sum of pixels only within said target block;                         
               searching a reference frame using said simplified                      
          signature block;                                                            
               searching for a best match in an area centered around                  
          said target block in said reference frame using said simplified             
          signature block;                                                            
               computing a sum of an absolute pixel-by-pixel difference               
          using motion vectors of said area and a zero motion vector;                 
               selecting a new block with a motion vector with a minimum              
          sum of said absolute pixel-by-pixel difference; and                         
               searching a new area centered around said new block for a              
          minimum absolute difference match.                                          
          The examiner relies on the following reference:                             
          Kondo et al. (Kondo)        5,453,800          Sep. 26, 1995                
          Claims 1-9 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as                       
          being anticipated by the disclosure of Kondo.                               
          Rather than repeat the arguments of appellant or the                        
          examiner, we make reference to the brief and the answer for the             
          respective details thereof.                                                 


                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007