The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte RANADEEP DUTTA
____________
Appeal No. 1999-2838
Application No. 08/812,848
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before RUGGIERO, DIXON, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges.
RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal from the final rejection
of claims 1-14, which are all of the claims pending in the
present application. An amendment after final rejection filed
November 10, 1998, which amended claims 1 and 2, was approved
for entry by the Examiner.
The claimed invention relates to a structure for
terminating the active area of a high voltage semiconductor
device. More particularly, the termination structure includes a
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007