KRAMER v. REIFART et al - Page 2




          Interference No. 103,358                                                    



          Before METZ, PATE and MARTIN, Administrative Patent Judges.                 
          PATE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                          

                          JUDGMENT UNDER 37 CFR § 1.662(a)                            
                    Now comes junior party Kramer with a concession of                
          priority.  Pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.662(a) such a concession is to            
          be treated as a request for entry of adverse judgment.  Accord-             
          ingly, the following judgment is entered.                                   
                    Additionally, junior party Kramer has withdrawn any               
          objection to Reifart’s 37 CFR § 1.634 motion for change of                  
          inventorship.  The interference has been redeclared in a separate           
          paper to reflect the change in inventorship.                                


                                      Judgment                                        
                    Judgment in Interference Number 103,358 is hereby                 
          entered against Barry L. Kramer, the junior party.  Barry L.                
          Kramer is not entitled to his patent claims 1-14 in U.S. Patent             
          No. 5,135,535 or to application claims 1, 20 and 23-27 in Serial            
          No. 07/881,673.  All these claims correspond to the count in                
          interference.  Judgment is entered in favor of Nikolaus Reifart             
          and Erik Andersen, the senior party.  Nikolaus Reifart and Erik             





                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007