Before: SCHAFER, LEE and SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judges. SCHAFER, Administrative Patent Judge. Each party has filed a contingent request for adverse judgment. All stated contingencies have been met. Litvak requests entry of adverse judgment as to the subject matter of Count 2. Paper 54. 1 Tang requests entry of judgment as to the subject matter of Count 3. Paper 59. The requests are granted. , ORDERED that judgment on priority as to the subject matter of Count 2 (Paper 61, p. 2) is awarded against the party, HERBERT E. LITVAK; FURTHER ORDERED that the party, HERBERT E. LITVAK, is not entitled to a patent containing claims 5-7, 8(5), 8(6) 9(5), 9(6), 13 and 19 (corresponding to Count 2) of Patent 5,499,733; FURTHER ORDERED that judgment on priority as to the subject matter of Count 3 (Paper 61, p. 3) is awarded against the party, WALLACE T. Y. TANG; FURTHER ORDERED that the party, WALLACE T. Y. TANG, is not entitled to a patent containing claims 55-58, 64, 67, 71(64), 73, 75, 77-81, 83, 84 and 86 (corresponding to Count 3) of Application 07/996,817; FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this judgment be made of record in Application 07/996,817 and Patent 5,499,733; andPage: Previous 1 2 3 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007