A. Findings of fact The record supports the following findings by at least a preponderance of the evidence.1 1. The interference involves (1) junior party patentee David S. Morrison (Morrison) and (2) senior party applicants Stephen C. Lakes; Henry G. Stoeppel, II, and Bruce J. Beimesch (Lakes). 2. Morrison is involved in the interference on the basis of Morrison U.S. Patent 5,378,249, issued 3 January 1995, based on application 08/082,696, filed 28 June 1993. 3. The real party in interest is Pennzoil Products Company. 4. Lakes is involved in the interference on the basis of two applications: a. Application 08/442,611, filed 17 May 1995 and b. Application 08/896,060, filed 17 July 1997. 5. The real party in interest is Henkel Corporation. 6. Lakes has been accorded benefit of the purpose of priority of: a. Application 08/119,318, filed 9 September 1993 and b. Application 07/937,625, filed 28 August 1992. 7. The interference involves two counts. 1 To the extent these findings of fact discuss legal issues, they may be treated as conclusions of law. - 2 -Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007