3. Anthony J. Zelano, counsel for Dionne. Part B. Relevant discussion during conference call The principal purpose of the conference call was to discuss the status of the interference. During the conference call, counsel for Dionne requested that adverse judgment be entered against Dionne. It is: ORDERED that judgment on priority to Count 1 (Notice Declaring Interference, Paper No. 1, page 47), the sole count in the interference, is awarded against Junior Party Dionne. FURTHER ORDERED that Junior Party Dionne is not entitled to a patent containing claims 1-5 of Dionne, U.S. Patent No. 5,538,975. FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this final decision shall be placed and given a paper number in the file of Dionne, U.S. Patent No. 5,538,975 and Liotta et al., U.S. Application No. 08/402,730. SALLY GARNER-LANE ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT SALLY C. MEDLEY ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) MICHAEL P. TIERNEY ) Administrative Patent Judge )Page: Previous 1 2 3 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007