The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper 21 Filed by: Trial Section Merits Panel Box Interference Washington, D.C. 20231 Tel: 703-308-9797 Fax: 703-305-0942 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _______________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _______________ ROBERT M. WAYMOUTH, ELISABETH HAUPTMAN, and GEOFFREY W. COATES, Junior Party, (Patent Application 09/110,691), v. JOHANNES A.M. VAN BEEK, JOHANNES G. DE VRIES, HENRICUS J. ARTS, RADJINDRAKUMAR PERSAD, and GERARDUS H.J. VAN DOREMAELE Senior Party, (Patent 5,646,322). ______________ Patent Interference No. 104,674 _______________ Before TORCZON, GARDNER-LANE, and MEDLEY, Administrative Patent Judges. GARDNER-LANE, Administrative Patent Judge. JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO 37 CFR § 1.662 Senior party Van Beek has requested entry of adverse judgment (37 CFR § 1.662(a)) (Paper 20).Page: 1 2 3 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007