The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today is not binding precedent of the Board
Filed by: Trial Section Merits Panel Paper No. 81
Box Interference
Washington, D.C. 20231
Tel: 703-308-9797
Fax: 703-305-0942
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
FRED D. MOORE, JR., ROBERT L. CONNEEN,
and CHARLES M. KRUGER, JR.,
Junior Party,
(Patent 6,024,175),
v.
GORAN SUNDHOLM,
Senior Party,
(Application 09/367,972).
_______________
Patent Interference No. 104,678
______________________
Before LEE, SPIEGEL, and MEDLEY, Administrative Patent Judges.
MEDLEY, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON JOINT RULE 633(b) PRELIMINARY MOTION
FOR NO INTERFERENCE-IN-FACT AND JUDGMENT
A. Introduction
This interference was declared on 27 April 2001. Oral
argument regarding the parties preliminary motions was held on
April 4, 2002. During oral argument, counsel for the respective
parties agreed that, absent Sundholm claim 12, there is no
interference-in-fact between Sundholm’s remaining claims 6, 10,
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007